RE: TOFW Pid

From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Fri Oct 26 2001 - 15:49:35 EDT

  • Next message: Apache: "Shift report 20011027 16:00-24:00"

    On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Ian Bearden wrote:
    
    > Hi Djamel,
    > Apart from the, er, ummmm... non-optimal momentum performance... this looks
    > really good.  I think that even though the momentum has, er, ummm...issues,
    > you can use this to get a first pbar over p, and K-/K+.  It would be very
    > interesting to finally see these numbers to compare with the 0.48 (y=2.1)
    > and 0.27 (y=3).
    
    Ok, I'll try that.
    
    > Also, have you checked a run with the opposite polarity (but same B, same
    > angle) to see if the positives then have the lower mass2.
    
    Not yet, but I think this is the first thing to do.
    
    > Anyway, thanks for the nice plots, and good job with the calibration
    > software (which is soon public?)!
    
    Yes, soon but I have to repeat something:
    if I commit things now, brat will be messed up since I use now the new 
    tracking classes and the BFS track is being tested and debugged (that's 
    not a good thing not to be able to read them back from disk). It's really 
    a major change and although I really will to do it now so that you guys 
    can use it, it simply won't work until I make sure that these new tracks 
    classes don't enter in conflict with other brat classes (note: I haven't 
    said users's codes...) I put in brconvnames the change from FFSTrack to 
    FfsTrack and so on. When I did it to my own brat, there was a big conflict 
    for ex. with something called BrGeantToMRSTrack. I guess people 
    using it wouldn't like being in a situation where this class is not 
    working at all.
    
    Please be patient. I know I repeated 1000 times that it would be ready for 
    the next day. I was wrong and I'm sorry about that. I realized how 
    brat is "infected" by weird old things that still show up and as Christian 
    said, we should eliminate them while progressing in our analysis work (I 
    do think that these kind of old things affect us in our efficiency at 
    analyzing data, that's the main reason why it takes more time).
    
    But I'm almost done with H2 (H2 in itself is like H1, the bfs track is 
    certainly not like the ffs track...ok, this statement will appeal some 
    comments from you Christian, about the spectrometer track classes. What 
    you propose is simply a too big change to be supported by the collab right 
    now, be patient too, we need a transition).
    
    Djam
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 26 2001 - 17:15:34 EDT