RHIC BEAM USE PROPOSAL for 2001: for debate

From: Jens Jorgen Gaardhoje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Oct 31 2000 - 05:50:02 EST

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Fw: Rhic Beam Use proposal"

    Dear BRAHMS friends
    
    RHIC is requesting written proposals for beam use for the spring/summer
    2001 run from the 4 experiments. The deadline is set to Nov. 10. The PAC
    convenes on NOV 30.
    
    We should thus come up with the wishes of the BRAHMS collaboration
    within the given constraints (up to 33 wks of beam in FY2001). 
    
    The following is an expression of my own views at this time, to be taken
    as an invitation  to a hopefully collaboration-wide discussion.
    
    1. Main priority should be given to Au+Au at full energy (100+100).
    Since complete BRAHMS measurements require many field and angle settings
    to cover the large acceptance, 
    we request that the dominant part of the beam be devoted to this. There
    are many 
    theoretical arguments for why 100+100 is MUCH better than 65+65 (if you
    believe them...).
    
    2. It is probably a good idea to request some weeks (one meonth? of
    65+65 Au+Au at high Luminosity. 
    Firstly, in order to be able to complete/extend the measurements taken
    in 2000 and secondly to make sure that we get adequate integrated
    luminosity for some measurements (one might fear that the development of
    the 100+100 beam may take a long time).
    
    3. It seems to me that we have little to gain from running other
    beams-species (i.e. lighter beams) at this stage. We have apparently
    adequate centrality selection and there are no obvious surprises in the
    global multiplicity distribution. So there are no compelling reasons to
    expect that a peripheral Au+Au is substantailly differnt from a central
    lighter ion collision. Developping a new beam species would undoubtedly
    take a fair amount of time.  
    Anyway I suspect that PHOBOS will ask for many beam species, so we
    should try to reduce this.
    
    4. In all likelyhood luminosity and duty factor will increase  sharply
    towards the end of the running period, as the urgency to produce results
    sets in. We should therefore seriously consider in what order
    measurements should be undertaken. F. ex. systematic high momentum
    measurements should only be scheduled late in the period. 
    
    cheers
    Jens Jorgen.  
    
    
     
    
    
    -- 
    ____________________________________________________
    JENS JORGEN GAARDHOJE
    Assoc. Prof. of Physics, Dr. Scient.
    
    Niels Bohr Institute, 
    University of Copenhagen
    Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen
    Denmark.
    
    Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09 (dir) 
         (+45) 35 32 52 09 (secr)
    Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16
    Email: gardhoje @ nbi.dk
    Home page: http://alf.nbi.dk/~gardhoje
    
    -Chair Ph. D. School of Physics at NBI.F.AFG.
     (secr. Frank Kristensen 35 32 04 41, Ørsted Lab.)
    -Member Danish National Commission for UNESCO 
     (secr. Ulla Holm 35 32 52 72, NBI)
    ___________________________________________________
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 05:51:02 EST