Michael, I agree But suggest "BRAHMINS". It is a word, avoids sexual discrimination implications , and is better than BRAHPERSONS-which might also be misconstrued. At 10:43 AM 10/30/00 -0600, you wrote: > Dear Brahmens, > in response to Jens Jorgen I think that the data are >very useful to the community even if we only know the systematic errors >to 12% or so. Nothing precludes us from publishing a more precise >measurement later on. Given independent systematic errors on the tiles, >the big beam counter tubes and the small tubes we can make an estimate >of the total yields and widths. Of course we have to propigate our >systematic and statistical errors correctly but this is not too >complicated. Also we can make use of Eta symetry and as further >constraint on the results. > It is very important, particulary for the smaller groups, that we >submit this paper as soon as possible. > Yours Michael >: >: Michael Murray murray@comp.tamu.edu >: Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, TX 77843-3366 >: Telephone (979) 845 1411, FAX 1899 > > >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.198 / Virus Database: 95 - Release Date: 10/4/00 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.198 / Virus Database: 95 - Release Date: 10/4/00
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 30 2000 - 10:59:51 EST