That seems fine to me. On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:42 PM, flemming videbaek wrote: > Hi > > Making the lines thicker is a good point. One could include the > indirect lines, but I suggest we just say in the caption > this is for 'positively' identified protons and deuterons. I like > to minimize my effort here. > > thanks > -F. > > > Flemming Videbaek > videbaek @ bnl.gov > Brookhaven National Lab > Physics Department > Bldg 510D > Upton, NY 11973 > > phone: 631-344-4106 > cell : 631-681-1596 > > > > > > On Feb 3, 2010, at 5:37 PM, caz_at_fys.ku.dk wrote: > >> If we make the line a little thicker I dont think we need to make the >> points blue. The deuterons however probably do need to be red (and >> in the >> marker size selected) to stand out. >> >> I am unsure what our policy is on it, but should we include a box >> around >> the inddirect protons as well? >> >> Regards >> >> Casper >> >> >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> This is not mean to be a final fig 2 for the d-p paper, but a >>> suggestion how to show the data. >>> The frames etc should better. But manipulation of data 2,3 and 4 deg >>> HF running + plotting of the PID selector >>> is correct. It will lot of pain also to make the proton selected >>> blue, >>> since this would imply merging even more histograms. >>> >>> F >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>> Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov >>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>> > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Wed Feb 03 2010 - 17:44:37 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 03 2010 - 17:44:49 EST