Hi Making the lines thicker is a good point. One could include the indirect lines, but I suggest we just say in the caption this is for 'positively' identified protons and deuterons. I like to minimize my effort here. thanks -F. Flemming Videbaek videbaek @ bnl.gov Brookhaven National Lab Physics Department Bldg 510D Upton, NY 11973 phone: 631-344-4106 cell : 631-681-1596 On Feb 3, 2010, at 5:37 PM, caz_at_fys.ku.dk wrote: > If we make the line a little thicker I dont think we need to make the > points blue. The deuterons however probably do need to be red (and > in the > marker size selected) to stand out. > > I am unsure what our policy is on it, but should we include a box > around > the inddirect protons as well? > > Regards > > Casper > > >> >> Hi >> >> This is not mean to be a final fig 2 for the d-p paper, but a >> suggestion how to show the data. >> The frames etc should better. But manipulation of data 2,3 and 4 deg >> HF running + plotting of the PID selector >> is correct. It will lot of pain also to make the proton selected >> blue, >> since this would imply merging even more histograms. >> >> F >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Brahms-dev-l mailing list >> Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >> _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Wed Feb 03 2010 - 17:43:01 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 03 2010 - 17:44:28 EST