Hi Truls, Truls Martin Larsen wrote: >Hi, > >I guess you mean AuAu@62.4 GeV :-) > > Sorry, the specie was right (it is cucu) but energy was wrong (it is 200), so 12414 is CuCu@200. (correct me if I'm wrong). >Could you do run it for the CuCu@62.4 GeV also, >say 4A1219 : 13698 - 13705 >and 4B1219 : 13904 - 13915 > >I would be grateful! > I will do it. Stay tuned. Cheers, Pawel. > >Cheers, > Truls > > > >On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:57 +0100, Pawel Staszel wrote: > > >>Dear Selemon, >> >>I made efficiency calculations for runs 12414 to 12421 (cucu 62, 4A861). >>The link to results and discussion is >>http://zefir.if.uj.edu.pl/staszel/brahms/fseffic/effic_test_run05_cucu/index.htm. >> >>I used stuff from banapp and got quite reasonable results except >>for runs 12414 and 12417 which have weird tracking in T1 and T2. >> >>(question: have you run condorOffset.sh and updated runs >>by offsets/UpdateEfficParamFile.C prior to running condorProd_EncT5.sh?) >> >>Cheers, >>Pawel. >> >> >> > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Pawel Staszel | | Jagiellonian University | | Institute of Physics email: ufstasze@if.uj.edu.pl | | Reymonta 4 phone: (+48) 12 663 5712 | | Krakow 30059 FAX: (+48) 12 633 7086 | | Poland | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Feb 6 11:32:51 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 11:33:04 EST