Hi, I guess you mean AuAu@62.4 GeV :-) Could you do run it for the CuCu@62.4 GeV also, say 4A1219 : 13698 - 13705 and 4B1219 : 13904 - 13915 I would be grateful! Cheers, Truls On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:57 +0100, Pawel Staszel wrote: > Dear Selemon, > > I made efficiency calculations for runs 12414 to 12421 (cucu 62, 4A861). > The link to results and discussion is > http://zefir.if.uj.edu.pl/staszel/brahms/fseffic/effic_test_run05_cucu/index.htm. > > I used stuff from banapp and got quite reasonable results except > for runs 12414 and 12417 which have weird tracking in T1 and T2. > > (question: have you run condorOffset.sh and updated runs > by offsets/UpdateEfficParamFile.C prior to running condorProd_EncT5.sh?) > > Cheers, > Pawel. > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Feb 6 11:06:04 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 06 2006 - 11:06:10 EST