Just a brief remark, No cuts are made in event selection incuding vertex from ltr-gtr-dst. A second remark, It sounds to me you still have to agree what goes into the dst - this should be clarified. It is not good if we end end with inconsistent sets of dst. / -------------------------------------------- Flemming Videbaek Physics Department Bldg 510-D Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY11973 phone: 631-344-4106 fax: 631-344-1334 e-mail: videbaek @ bnl.gov ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johnson, Erik B" <ebj@ku.edu> To: "Hironori Ito" <hito@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>; "brahms-dev-l" <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2005 12:53 AM Subject: RE: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights > Hiro, > I would think so. I would rather determine the reaction plane resolution from the DSTs then from my own trees to ensure > consistancy. This also means that you would need to make sure vertices from -45cm on up are in the DST. > I also had a very quick look at BdstGlobalModule and I didn't see all of the silicon rings (1a-1g) in the module. Are they > there? > Erik > > > ________________________________ > > From: brahms-dev-l-bounces@lists.bnl.gov on behalf of Hironori Ito > Sent: Sat 11/26/2005 6:26 PM > To: brahms-dev-l > Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights > > > > Hello. I was actually talking about centrality from tile. Does this > info/variable needs to be dst? > > Hiro > > Johnson, Erik B wrote: > >>Hiro, >> I have never dealt with the bdst classes. So I'm not sure if it is necessary or not. What would need to be updated? Erik >> >> >>________________________________ >> >>From: Hironori Ito [mailto:hito@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov] >>Sent: Sat 11/26/2005 5:29 PM >>To: Sanders, Stephen J >>Cc: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev >>Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >> >> >> >>Did you also change bdst class? Is that necessary? >> >>Hiro >> >>Stephen Sanders wrote: >> >> >> >>>Yes, The official brat should be updated. Otherwise the new AuAu >>>cent calibration >>>will not be incorporated in the lastest dsts. >>>..steve >>>On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Johnson, Erik B wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Flemming, >>>> I haven't changed anything in brat for about a couple weeks now. >>>>So as long as the offical brat has been updated before that then we >>>>are good. >>>>I know Hiro had a question about the flow code at one point and it >>>>looked like he didn't have the newest version. I'm assuming that he >>>>resolved this issue. >>>>Erik >>>> >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Flemming Videbaek [mailto:videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov] >>>>Sent: Fri 11/25/2005 12:56 PM >>>>To: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev >>>>Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >>>> >>>>Hi Erik, >>>> >>>>Should the official brat be updated before the DSTs for the auau are >>>>processed? >>>>Let us have an answer before processing starts. >>>> >>>>Flemming >>>> >>>>-------------------------------------------- >>>>Flemming Videbaek >>>>Physics Department >>>>Bldg 510-D >>>>Brrokhaven National Laboratory >>>>Upton, NY11973 >>>> >>>>phone: 631-344-4106 >>>>fax: 631-344-1334 >>>>e-mail: videbaek @ bnl.gov >>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>From: "Johnson, Erik B" <ebj@ku.edu> >>>>To: "Brahms Dev" <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov> >>>>Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 1:52 PM >>>>Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hiro, >>>>> Here is an update on the normalization weights. All but 16 runs >>>>>have been completed. I don't know what's been happening with >>>>>these last sixteen runs, but I have changed the method a little >>>>>bit. Instead of processing 1billion events, I limited it to >>>>>10million. The results should not change significantly, but the >>>>>weight will be calculated faster. I will keep a closer eye on >>>>>them. As for the rest of the runs, I have checked them and I have >>>>>committed them to the database. I will keep a closer eye on >>>>>the last 16 runs over the day and weekend. >>>>> If you want to start processing the DSTs there is a list of runs >>>>>that DO NOT have the norm weight committed to the database. >>>>>9541 - 9546 >>>>>9701 - 9711 >>>>>9836 - 9836 >>>>>9840 - 9840 >>>>>9844 - 9844 >>>>>9845 - 9845 >>>>>9847 - 9849 >>>>>9930 - 9930 >>>>>9945 - 9945 >>>>>10051 - 10054 >>>>>10456 - 10456 >>>>>10458 - 10458 >>>>>10626 - 10626 >>>>>10855 - 10875 >>>>>10948 - 10952 >>>>>11117 - 11129 >>>>>These runs are NOT calibrated!!! >>>>> >>>>> I have rechecked the flow modules and they seem to be working >>>>>correctly. >>>>> >>>>> I will send you an update when more runs are finished. >>>>>Erik >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>>>>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>>>>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>>>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>>>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>>> >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Brahms-dev-l mailing list >>>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >>>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Sun Nov 27 07:46:39 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 27 2005 - 07:47:28 EST