Hi Hiro, Sorry, I should have been more precise in my wording. The question was really if we (as a collaboration) have standard Npart and Nbin numbers for the 62.4 data? It's great that you tell us how to estimate the numbers, but I think we should have (only) one set of numbers so that we are consistent, at least within the collaboration. Also, the method you suggest will not give the errors on Npart and Nbin or tell how large a fraction of all inel collisions was recorded... but thanks anyway for the update. Cheers, Claus On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Hironori Ito wrote: > Hello. Since many people ask, here is the instruction of how to make a > root tree file (with ncol/npart and nch) for your need. > > 1. cp dndy.f, rdzevt.F, Makefile and userpar.par from ~hito/dndy > directory in rcas. (you can get rdzevt.F from BREG if you wish) > 2. make rzdevt.o and make dndy > 3. make symbolic link, "tape1", to actual hijing data eg ln -s > /brahms/data01/simu/event_data/hijing_new/AuAu_63_0_18.zdat tape1 > 4. run dndy (you can set number of events in userpar.par) > 5. This will make dndy.hbk and ntuple.dat (both of them are hbook file) > 6. Use h2root to convert ntuple.dat to ROOT tree file. eg. h2root > ntuple.dat AuAu63GeV.root > 7. in this root tree file, you will find, b, nch (for -2<eta<2 range), > nchall, ncol, npart, nppart (projectile participant), ntpart (target > participant). > > > Ok. So, nobody will going to ask for any more of those files. Now, do > any of you need an instruction to use brhijing? > > By the way, I did made tree file for AuAu63GeV(not 62.4GeV since I did > not have 62.4GeV Hijing around). AuAu63GeVNtuple.root is sitting in > ~hito/dndy/ directory (rcas). > > Hiro > > > Claus O. E. Jorgensen wrote: > > >Dear collaborators, > > > >Did anyone (most likely Steve or Hiro) try to estimate the Nbin and Npart > >for the 62.4 GeV collisions? I'm trying to write up the 62.4 GeV high pt > >story and I need the numbers (for 0-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40-60% centrality). > >So far I've just estimated it from HIJING, but I don't think it's good > >enough if we want to publish the results. Have more detailed study (using > >brag) been made? Also, how much of the total inel cross section does our > >MB sample at this energy correspond to? > > > >Cheers, > > > >Claus > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Brahms-l mailing list > >Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > >http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > > > > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Wed Nov 24 05:19:02 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 24 2004 - 05:19:27 EST