Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Re: [Fwd: efficiencies]

From: Pawel Staszel <ufstasze@if.uj.edu.pl>
Date: Thu Dec 18 2003 - 11:58:07 EST
Hi Bjorn and Zhongbao,


>>Pawel, do we need to redo local tracking for dAu? I hope not.
>>    
>>
>
>I guess we do, right? All runs should have the above parameters set...
>  
>
I thing so as well.
The fine calibration I committed yesterday keeps T4 and T5 resolution on the
very nice level, slightly below 100microns, and I guess that the previous
local tracking was much worst.

The pp is completely done in terms of DC calibration and that's a good
idea to start with pp first.

Zhongbao, If you want to include some other d+Au runs (which were not 
included on
the list I got for you on 12/12), let me know ASAP. I will check the 
calibration before Bjorn starts
local tracking. 

Cheers
Pawel.

>--
>Bjorn H. Samset                           Phone: 22856465/92051998
>PhD student, heavy ion physics            Adr:   Schouterrassen 6
>Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo             0573 Oslo
>                              \|/
>----------------------------> -*- <-----------------------------
>                              /|\
>
>_______________________________________________
>Brahms-dev-l mailing list
>Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
>http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
>
>  
>





_______________________________________________
Brahms-dev-l mailing list
Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
Received on Thu Dec 18 05:54:18 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 18 2003 - 05:54:36 EST