READ e-mail before asking questions. There were more than a few emails regarding this issues. Hiro yin.zhongbao@fi.uib.no wrote: >Hi. > >I have done TimeOffset calibration for TOFW. So far I combine e.g. runs >8417 - 8459 in one batch and runs 8494 - 8505 in another batch. The reason >for combining these run numbers is simply to obtain enough statistics. >When looking at the output timing offsets I see a difference of ~8 ns >between these batches. From the first batch I typically get offsets >for different slats in the range -45 - -50 ns, while the second batch >gives offsets in the range -36 - -42. Is there anyone who could point >me to the reason for this difference as I believe it is significant? >Was there some cable changed and started at which run number? > >Best regards, >Zhongbao >----------------------------------------------------- >Zhongbao YIN Phone: +47-55-582792 (O) >Address: +47-55-276803 (H) > Fantoftveien 14G 466 E-mail: > 5075 Bergen Yin.Zhongbao@fi.uib.no >------------------------------------------------------ > > >_______________________________________________ >Brahms-dev-l mailing list >Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Wed Nov 26 21:03:56 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 21:04:10 EST