Hironori Ito wrote: > Hello. I thought I remind everyone that timings for dAu and pp are > different by about 8ns (due to an addition of 8ns cable to start > time). Therefore, even if you calibrate the last run of dAu, you MUST > also calibrate the first run of pp (for at least time offset). > Hiro Yes, that was my observation that times in Td1 are different for d+Au and p+p by about 8ns. So, we need time offset calibration for the beginning of the pp run (~8704) (the existed time offset calibration is for 8650 which is d+Au) Cheers Pawel. > > Bjorn H Samset wrote: > >> Hi all. >> >> As promised eariler, I've looked at the TD1 calibrations for 2003 >> data. It >> seems that I was overly negative - only the start of useful dAu runs had >> bad calibrations, while from 8485 and on the calibs from march seem OK. >> I've therefore committed ADC gain, time offsets and delta delay >> calibs for >> tun 8307 (the latter was indeed needed...) >> >> I'm running the global tracking and dsts for the affected runs now, >> but a >> prelim reco of run 8307 at least looks fine (also, the double-band in H1 >> PID is gone as hoped). >> >> So - with that I think we're ready for some new H1/H2 calibs where >> needed >> :-) >> >> -- >> Bjorn H. Samset Phone: 22856465/92051998 >> PhD student, heavy ion physics Adr: Schouterrassen 6 >> Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo 0573 Oslo >> \|/ >> ----------------------------> -*- <----------------------------- >> /|\ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Brahms-dev-l mailing list >> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov >> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Thu Nov 20 11:53:47 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 20 2003 - 11:54:05 EST