Hi Bjorn, > I'm actually not responsible for this one(!) - the members were taken out > of the "default" bdst at some point for reasons that I don't know. But if > there is an interest in this kind of "basic" TPC data in the DSTs I can > make sure they are there in the next generation. > > If noone else comments I'll just put it back in, but maybe someone has > other opinions? I think we should only put in what's needed in the further analysis. I know that each branch does not take up very much space, but still... I guess that nclusters and maybe nallhits could be of interest when calculating the efficiency (what's the difference between these members), but I would skip the rest. I believe stuff like ntracks is stored somewhere else. Cheers, Claus > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > I try to analyze the dst's you generated and find that some data > > members from the AuAu analysis are not there anymore. E.g. > > ... > > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNallHits; > > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNtrack; > > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNsingleHit; > > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNsingleHitDec; > > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNmultHitDec; > > UInt_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fUniqueID; > > UInt_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fBits; > > UChar_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fIsPersistent; > > Char_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fName[64]; > > Char_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fTitle[64]; > > Int_t TPM2RDO_fNclusters; > > Int_t TPM2RDO_fCStatus; > > ... > > > > > > Could you explain the reason why these members are not considered > > necessary for the dAu analysis? And for sake of backward compatibility > > wouldn't it be better to have them included, even though they would be > > dummy variables for dAu? > > > > Best regards, > > Zhongbao > > > -- > Bjorn H. Samset Phone: 22856465/92051998 > PhD student, heavy ion physics Adr: Schouterrassen 6 > Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo 0573 Oslo > \|/ > ----------------------------> -*- <----------------------------- > /|\ >Received on Thu Nov 6 11:43:32 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 11:43:57 EST