On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 yin.zhongbao@fi.uib.no wrote: Hi Zhongbao. I'm actually not responsible for this one(!) - the members were taken out of the "default" bdst at some point for reasons that I don't know. But if there is an interest in this kind of "basic" TPC data in the DSTs I can make sure they are there in the next generation. If noone else comments I'll just put it back in, but maybe someone has other opinions? -B > Hi Bjorn, > > I try to analyze the dst's you generated and find that some data > members from the AuAu analysis are not there anymore. E.g. > ... > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNallHits; > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNtrack; > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNsingleHit; > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNsingleHitDec; > Int_t TPM1RDO_fNmultHitDec; > UInt_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fUniqueID; > UInt_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fBits; > UChar_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fIsPersistent; > Char_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fName[64]; > Char_t TPM2RDO_BrDataObject_fTitle[64]; > Int_t TPM2RDO_fNclusters; > Int_t TPM2RDO_fCStatus; > ... > > > Could you explain the reason why these members are not considered > necessary for the dAu analysis? And for sake of backward compatibility > wouldn't it be better to have them included, even though they would be > dummy variables for dAu? > > Best regards, > Zhongbao -- Bjorn H. Samset Phone: 22856465/92051998 PhD student, heavy ion physics Adr: Schouterrassen 6 Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo 0573 Oslo \|/ ----------------------------> -*- <----------------------------- /|\Received on Thu Nov 6 11:23:00 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 06 2003 - 11:23:10 EST