Re: Fields and currents

From: Ramiro Debbe (debbe@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 13:34:47 EDT

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "change of crs queues"
    If you are using the permanent Hall probe readouts without any further 
    change you will not have the correct field value.
    The Hall probes are located right on the magnet poles and most on the 
    time two to three gap heights into the magnet gap.
    At those locations they are sensing the saturation in the iron. That 
    must be most of the deviation one can see in the plots.
    The value of By at high field deviates from a linear function of the 
    current because of saturation and hopefully that is well described by 
    the parametrisation  in BRAT.
    
    The last measurements I did for all our magnets should give you the 
    translation between permanent Hall probe readings and the value of the 
    field in the middle of the gaps. For D4 I have two sets of 
    measurements, one with the Hall probe in the old
    position, and a second one where the Hall probe was moved deeper into 
    the magnet gap. (this last settings can be used for the dA and this 
    last pp run and all future runs)
    
    Ramiro
    
    
    On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 12:21 PM, Claus O. E. Jorgensen wrote:
    
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > I'm currently looking at the high field Au+Au runs and I'm having some
    > trouble at the edges of the acceptance - the data is not right on the
    > MC so I started looking at the magnetic field. Is it correct that we
    > still use the (2nd order) parametrization of the field?
    >
    > I've compared the field I get from BRAT and what has been measured (By)
    > with the Hall probe and there is a small discrepancy which I guess 
    > would
    > effect the high field data the most. Have a look:
    >
    > www.nbi.dk/~ekman/fieldVsCurrent.gif
    >
    > Putting the numbers directly in BrMagnetVolume would be very easy, but 
    > I
    > guess that's not good enough. Do we want to store this information in 
    > the
    > DB? And what does it take? I think it's pretty important if we want to
    > make a good analysis of the high field data...
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > Claus
    >
    > +------------------------------------------------------------+
    > | Claus E. Jørgensen             Phone  : (+45) 33 32 49 49  |
    > | Cand. Scient. (M. Sc.)         Cell   : (+45) 27 29 49 49  |
    > |                                Office : (+45) 35 32 54 04  |
    > | Niels Bohr Institute, Ta-2,    Fax    : (+45) 35 32 50 16  |
    > | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100,       E-mail : ekman@nbi.dk       |
    > | University of Copenhagen       Home   : www.nbi.dk/~ekman/ |
    > +------------------------------------------------------------+
    >
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 12 2003 - 13:35:26 EDT