From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 13:58:14 EST
> > Thanks Djamel, good work. (We have a quench link here at BNL, so I have > loads of reading-time ;-) Just to get things straight: Are you > implementing your new methods for FFS matching as default now, or just > adding them for possible use? I don't know yet, I have to show differences between the method used so far and the one I have in mind, it won't take that long I think. I'm waiting firt some trackign test for T2 (Peter's doing it). > Also, have you (or Peter?) tried looking at > the efficiency with the new slat-cut correction and/or matching criteria? > not yet. > Now the fake-band-ting. You've concluded that it's due to multiple hits - > sounds reasonable. I have lots of pp data lying around, so I quickly drew > up the same plot for a subset of these (the 64** runs). Here: > > http://www.fys.uio.no/~bjornhs/images/h1BetaVsEnergy.gif really cool! but did you draw it in log Z ? > > It's clear that we do not have the same problem for the pp data, which > would be natural since multiple hits are far less likely here. > yeah that's right. If one can pick up the macro I wrote for displaying the matching and modified it for pp data ? (don't think it would take long, in the Init method, just add the proper modules and pick the right thing in the Event method) -- Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o | Niels Bohr Institute | Home: | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø | Jagtvej 141 2D, | | Fax: +45 35 32 50 16 | DK-2200 Copenhagen N | | Tel: +45 35 32 52 69 | +45 35 86 19 74 | | http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane | | ouerdane@nbi.dk | o---------------------------------------------------------o
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 24 2003 - 13:58:57 EST
