From: Bjorn H Samset (bjornhs@rcf2.rhic.bnl.gov)
Date: Mon Feb 24 2003 - 04:01:33 EST
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Djamel Ouerdane wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is my latest TOF analysis. When I commit all my changes to brat > (some > time today), I'd like someone to take over since I have some piece of > literature to think about and to write ... :) > > Follow the link http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane/quick > > Good reading (it's not so long and it has a lot of nice plots). Thanks Djamel, good work. (We have a quench link here at BNL, so I have loads of reading-time ;-) Just to get things straight: Are you implementing your new methods for FFS matching as default now, or just adding them for possible use? Also, have you (or Peter?) tried looking at the efficiency with the new slat-cut correction and/or matching criteria? Now the fake-band-ting. You've concluded that it's due to multiple hits - sounds reasonable. I have lots of pp data lying around, so I quickly drew up the same plot for a subset of these (the 64** runs). Here: http://www.fys.uio.no/~bjornhs/images/h1BetaVsEnergy.gif It's clear that we do not have the same problem for the pp data, which would be natural since multiple hits are far less likely here. Based on what you've shown, it should be possible to clean up our data quite a bit. Thanks again :-) -- Bjorn H. Samset Phone: 22856465/92051998 PhD student, heavy ion physics Adr: Schouterrassen 6 Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo 0573 Oslo \|/ ----------------------------> -*- <----------------------------- /|\
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 24 2003 - 04:02:54 EST
