Hi, [Thread shifted to brahms-dev-l] On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:49:35 +0200 (CEST) Djamel Ouerdane <ouerdane@nbi.dk> wrote concerning "RE: TOFW Pid": > When I did it to my own brat, there was a big conflict for ex. with > something called BrGeantToMRSTrack. I guess people using it wouldn't > like being in a situation where this class is not working at all. Is this class used at all? It's a poorly designed class. It should inherit from BrMatchModule rather than use that class. Also, it seems that all you need as input to that class is BrTrack in TPM1 and TPM2, it then creates the track matches and BrMrsTrack objects. Then it sets the matching momentum to the corresponding BRAG track (ignores the momentum determination from the matching). It seems that the class can be migrated to use BrTrack fairly easily, doesn't it? > But I'm almost done with H2 (H2 in itself is like H1, the bfs track > is certainly not like the ffs track...ok, this statement will > appeal some comments from you Christian, about the spectrometer > track classes. Uh? How so is the BFS tracks different from FFS tracks? Both are straight line segments, joined by matches, and then additional hits added on top. How is that different in the two (expect that you have 2 line segments in FFS and 3 in BFS)? > What you propose is simply a too big change to be supported by the > collab right now, be patient too, we need a transition). It's really not that big if you think about it (which you need to do thoug - no such thing as a free lunch :-), and we're better off doing it ASAP then ALAP. Yours, Christian Holm Christensen ------------------------------------------- Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Cell: (+45) 28 82 16 23 Denmark Office: (+45) 353 25 305 Email: cholm@nbi.dk Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Oct 27 2001 - 09:47:49 EDT