Hi Djam et al, On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 01:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Djamel Ouerdane <ouerdane@nbi.dk> wrote concerning "Re: Use Text_t or Char_t ?": > > > > Why did you introduce another shell script? We the heck didn't you > > just add an option to the old shell script? It's no good forking the > > code like that. > > Relax Christian, I'm not a bash user and don't have time to appreciate > bash against csh. Oh, I'm quite calm. And really it's very simple (though you're initial brconvnames_old was really bad) - after all, it's "if"s, and "while"s, variables, and so on - you know - Fortran like. BTW, did you guys know that there's a new Fortran coming out next year? Yep, I couldn't believe it either - flogging a dead horse. > I knew that you would anyway rewrite the stuff :) An attitude I'm not very pleased with, one I helped build up I'm afraid, but still - I don't like it. Yours, Christian Holm Christensen ------------------------------------------- Address: Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Cell: (+45) 28 82 16 23 Denmark Office: (+45) 353 25 305 Email: cholm@nbi.dk Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 24 2001 - 05:52:33 EDT