Hi Jens Ivar It was done as part of a test, and has continued being used since the next step has proceeded a bit slowly, eventually you will not have to do this trick. The trick is also that they have not modified brat, but made a 5 minutes module (if you use Christians elisp stuff) that does the job for them. They then insert it in the event stream after tracking, but before matching, so they don't have to change their brat just include the standalone library in the config script and add the module. Have a little more faith, please;) Cheers Peter On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Jens Ivar Jordre wrote: > On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Peter H. L. Christiansen wrote: > > > The BrModuleMatch track is currently being rewritten to use the new > > classes. What they are doing here at BNL is using the new track classes, > > converting BrTrack to BrDetectorTrack, and then use the old matching and > > pid classes. And this is working. Eun-Joo can tell you more about this. > > Do you mean that this conversion is done as a test of > BrTrack/BrModuleMatchTrack, or will the "final" version of > BrModuleMatchTrack have to convert BrTrack to BrDetectorTrack? I really > hope the latter is not the case. > > Best wishes from > Jens Ivar > > -- :-) --------------------------------- )-: |Peter H L Christiansen aka PAN @ NBI | |EMAIL : pchristi@nbi.dk | |OFFICE : Tb1 @ NBI | |PHONE : 353 25269 | |SNAIL : Hans Tavsensgade 35, 4th | |PHONE : 35 349336 | :-D --------------------------------- \-:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 03 2001 - 20:19:35 EDT