Hi Kris et al, On Tue, 08 May 2001 14:38:02 -0500 hagel@comp.tamu.edu wrote concerning ": Re: FW: Proposal to change BrSiRdo and BTileRdo - once again!": > OK, mult guys say it is ok then it is ok by me. What do you think of the nested classes thing? Methink (*) it a bloody neat thing to do, and it doesn't break the general idea. > Don't get rid of BrDataObject. Just because it was introduced back > then does not mean it was introduced for the same purpose as > BrClonesArray. I probably introduced many classes that day, some of > which were to hide root (BrClonesArray + others) many which were for > the framework. I didn't ever plan on removing BrDataObject, put wanted to point out it's overhead and also that in some respect it's not needed. Anyway, you can sleep soundly tonighte. (*) Ian thinks that sounds stupid so I thought I'd write it so that he'd have something to laugh/yell at :-) Yours, Christian ----------------------------------------------------------- Holm Christensen Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Office: (+45) 353 25 305 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm Denmark Email: cholm@nbi.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 09 2001 - 13:02:05 EDT