Re: fs geometry

From: Pawel Staszel (staszel@alf.nbi.dk)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:25:41 EST

Next message: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: fs geometry"

Previous message: Christian Holm Christensen: "Re: BRAT 1.12.5"
In reply to: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: fs geometry"
Next in thread: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: fs geometry"
Reply: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: fs geometry"
Reply: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: fs geometry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I've checked refangl and it does work as expected.
So, what can I do with detector/magnet positions? For example, D1
position is OK,
but x, z  for D2 using gbrahms are -69.821, 649.76
compare to  -59.566, 651.131 when analyzing the data. The difference,
specially in
the x direction isn't negligible.

Pawel.

Next message: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: fs geometry"
Previous message: Christian Holm Christensen: "Re: BRAT 1.12.5"
In reply to: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: fs geometry"
Next in thread: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: fs geometry"
Reply: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: fs geometry"
Reply: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: fs geometry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 24 2001 - 07:26:14 EST