Re: BRAT changes (filter)

From: Flemming Videbaek (videbaek@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov)
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 15:16:03 EST

  • Next message: Konstantin Olchanski: "Local copy of LeCroy web pages" 

    I will like to second the opinion voiced by Djamel. The result of a
filtering is the normal action of the module not a disaster, problems etc.
The module could
still have this going on but this is differentger  (e.g. the trigger word
not present). Also does this philosofy match the  error messaning?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Djamel Ouerdane" <ouerdane@nbi.dk>
To: <brahms-dev-l@bnl.gov>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: BRAT changes


> Hi Christian,
>
> I think that's a nice effort you put in the module communication. I would
> suggest just one thing, concerning the event filtering. It seems to me
> that when an event doesn't match your filter conditions, it's not a
> DISASTER :) maybe setting the status to kDisaster is a bit too much and
> since it's more a veto that the user opposes, why not using something like
> kVeto ?
>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 20 2001 - 18:41:35 EST