Re: BRAT changes

From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Sat Jan 20 2001 - 07:28:05 EST

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: BRAT changes"

    Hi Christian,
    
    I think that's a nice effort you put in the module communication. I would
    suggest just one thing, concerning the event filtering. It seems to me
    that when an event doesn't match your filter conditions, it's not a
    DISASTER :) maybe setting the status to kDisaster is a bit too much and
    since it's more a veto that the user opposes, why not using something like
    kVeto ?
    
    Another small comment: you said that when status == Disaster, the
    container will stop the loop for this module and set it's status to
    failure. I don't get it since you have kFailure and kDisaster.
    
    Ciao
    Djam 
    
    :o) ****************************************************** )o:
    |ME	: Djamel Ouerdane   EMAIL  : ouerdane@nbi.dk         |
    |OFFICE : Tb1 @ NBI	    PHONE  : +45 353 252 69 (office) |
    |INST   : Niels Bohr Institute,                              | 
    |         Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 København Ø, Danmark          |
    |HOME	: Jagtvej 141 2D, 2200 København N, Danmark  <- NEW!!! 
    :oD ****************************************************** \o:
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 20 2001 - 07:28:57 EST