Re: T2 problem ?

From: Flemming Videbaek (videbaek@sgs1.hirg.bnl.goV)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:19:01 EDT

  • Next message: I. G. Bearden: "Re: T2 problem ?"

    Let me just add a few words.
    The additional card was added because T2 is 7*16 wide and you should always
    have a pair
    of FEE cards on a cable segment. And it had to be close. In some sense it
    has to be
    considered a bonus, though we may not use it. You map also shows as I am
    sure you are aware
    the row 10 pad 0-15 that are dead , and the row 6 poad 80-95. The problem I
    described in
    an earlier message from oct 12. This did not precisely detail how to blank
    ou pad' but is done
    by setting the BrDetectorParamsTPC  e.g. t2_param->SetDeadPads(6,80,95).
    
    Thus one could add the information from row 13-14 but the acceptance might
    in fact be more difficult
    to evaluate.
    
    Flemming
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:22:45 EDT