Ok, I have a few words on this. > WHO TOLD YOU THAT YOU CAN DECIDE HOW WE CUT CENTRALITY!!! We all decide how we want to cut in centrality, and the best decision is made if we are able to discuss different methods. That's the strength of working together in a team/collaboration. Since Christian did not delete or change your centrality method, I don't see what the problem is. > Did Steve, Y.K, Ramiro and I (or somebody else working on mult detector > (I can not think anybody else) ) ever ask you to write the centrality > code??? In my opinion everyone can write code for any detector, then we can discuss and decide which method is the best afterwards. > However, it is decided that the cut in multiplicity is easier > (normalization and background correction on a real data) and more clear > (presentation and discussion) than what you just have done. Also, look at > the other experiment at the RHIC. (STAR, PHOBOS and even PHENIX though > they also use ZDC) If the cut in mult and the cut in energy selects the same sample of events, why not go for the simple one (energy)? If they select different samples of events, we should of cause discuss which one is the most correct. We can of course only discuss this when both methods are committed to BRAT. By the way, why don't we use the ZDCs also (in combination with mult/energy measurements)? Cheers, Claus +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Claus Jørgensen | | Cand. Scient. Phone : (+45) 33 32 49 49 | | Cell : (+45) 27 28 49 49 | | Niels Bohr Institute, Ta-2, Office : (+45) 35 32 53 07 | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100, E-mail : ekman@nbi.dk | | University of Copenhagen Home : www.nbi.dk/~ekman/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 05 2001 - 05:45:54 EDT