Hi Flemming andd others, On Sat, 15 Apr 2000 15:45:44 -0400 "videbaek" <videbaek@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov> wrote: > Since the change of RCF systems the gbrahms exhibits some > pecularities when linked with the /cern/99/lib libraries. This is in > part because those libraries are compiled under RH5.2.The command line > execution works but not when re-directing input. The recommended LIB > setup for rcf is thus to have LIB == /cern/2000/lib an area that in > fact points to afs. Additionally a local brahms copy has been put on > ~brahmlib/i386_redhat60/cern/2000/lib and /bin. > No extensive checking has been done, but seem to run normally. And indeed it does. We've compiled GBRAHMS for both Redhat 6.1 and Redhat 5.2, using the CERNLIB 2000, EGCS 1.1.2, and it works fine. Oh, and a couple of questions for you Flemming: * I quess the output from Fritiof and Venus are ZEBRA files, but is it in some standard format, so that it's easy to read? In particular, what would it take to make a C++ class read those files? Can the standard TVenus class be linked to the venus distribution on the CVS? * The output from GBRAHMS (using gbr2c.f) has the CDAT format, I guess created by you, but what it take to write those files in a standard ZEBRA way? The reason why I'm asking, is because of the library generated by the gh2root utility, accepts a `standard' (what ever that might be) ZEBRA input file, and it'd be nice to test that library (if it's easy). thanks, Christian ----------------------------------------------------------- Holm Christensen Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Office: (+45) 353 25 305 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm Denmark Email: cholm@nbi.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 18 2000 - 05:57:36 EDT