Dear Collaborator, In order to move the long paper on pp at 62 and 200 gev forward we are soliciting input from the collaboration on the following main points relating to the attached rough draft of the paper. - Is the overall content and the organization of the paper reasonable? Do you have suggestions for thing to remove or things to add? - Do the figures represent the data and discussion well? -Please do not spend you time commenting of the text itself, unless you think it is wrong, or ambigious. The text still have open issues, usually addressed by sections in red, so you can see where we believe there is work to do. Kris and I are quite busy doing non-BRAHMS related work, but we feel that getting feedback from you we should be able to move the paper along, and hopefully ending up with less revisions down the line. We will receive comments at any time, but like to set a loose deadline for comments in about 3 weeks. best regards Kris and Flemming Flemming Videbaek videbaek @ bnl.gov Brookhaven National Lab Physics Department Bldg 510D Upton, NY 11973 phone: 631-344-4106 cell : 631-681-1596 _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Mon Mar 21 2011 - 16:59:38 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Mar 21 2011 - 17:00:40 EDT