[Brahms-l] Minutes of Brahms Meeting 25 Sept 2009

From: Michael Murray <mjmurray_at_ku.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:56:07 -0500
Minutes of BRAHMS Analysis Meeting Friday 25 September 2009
===========================================================

Present: Kris, Flemming, JH, Ramiro, Challis, Steve, Michael
Selemon and Casper sent email reports

Agenda http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=68938

09:30 	discussion on k/pi paper  	Ionut, Flemming
A new version is made available by Ionut
- some discussion systematic errors.
- final figures ok.
- other comments

09:50 	recent discussion on ptopi paper  	Pawel Staszel
10:20 	p + p stopping revisited                Kris Hagel

We started with Kris
pp Stopping
===========

Kris has taken NA49's 17GeV net proton dN/dxf distribution and  
transformed it to our beam energies. We then see that the transformed  
dN/dy distribution equals our data at 62 and 200GeV. This is  
equivalent to saying the dN/dXf is the same at the 3 energies. He is  
working on producing net baryons. This has some statistical problems  
since he is getting correction factors from Pythia. Currently he sees  
no lambda's in his simulation.
(Note: This problem was solved by the end of the afternoon).

k/pi Ionut:
===========
We discussed the comparison between STARs photon yield at forward  
rapidity, which is 2*pi0 and our charged pions. They are  
significantly higher than ours at y=3.5. Also our <pT> is seems high  
for that bin. Notice we only include 20% of acceptance. Ionut  
estimates that the systematic error is at least 25%. Flemming  
suggests 30% and adding it to the figure.

There was some discussion on the figures and slopes vs pbar/p.  
Michael suggested comparing NA49 slopes vs our as a function of y-ybeam.

Recent discussion on ptopi paper: Pawel
=======================================
There was a good discussion on the physics discussion in Pawel's  
paper. The  coalesence models are best suited to mid-rapidity.  
Therminator has some advantages in this region and that is why we can  
do the comparison to this.
Pawel had some concerns about weak decays.  There was an animated  
discussion on the physics of quark coalescence, velocity fields and  
constituent vs valence quarks. There seemed to be a sense that we  
should drop the discussion of the velocity fields. Pawel will go over  
the text and update it, trying to address the concerns expressed  
today. He will also include a discussion of weak decays.

CuCu: Selemon
=============
Selemon was not at the meeting but sent a report. He has extracted dN/ 
dy and <pt> from individual fits to the pi,k,p spectra. He now has to  
update the tables and the text in the paper.

d/p: Casper
===========
Casper had planned to attend but got held up. He is running flemmings  
macro to develop lambda corrections for the proton spectra. He  
should  have this done by next week.

==================  Submitted by Michael Murray ========================

_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
Received on Fri Sep 25 2009 - 16:56:06 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 25 2009 - 16:57:42 EDT