Re: [Brahms-l] qm proceedings

Hi Flemming,  No fair telling us Bente has edited the contribution!    
Now I have to question all of my suggestions
in terms of whether they would pass muster of an English Professor!

In any case, I've suggested some minor changes at
http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~sanders/qm2009_videbaek_Comments.pdf

I used the acrobat editing tools.  Let me know if you have a problem  
reading any of the suggestions.
...steve

On Jul 26, 2009, at 3:17 PM, flemming videbaek wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I have produced a revised version of the contribution for the  
> plenary talk.
> I revisited the physics material carefully, the references,
> and had the proceedings reviewed for language, grammar and  
> punctuation by Bente.
>
> It is available on http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~videbaek/analysis/qm2009_videbaek.pdf
> Please send me your final comments by tomorrow morning, since I like  
> to submit this by noon time.
>
> regards
> 	Flemming
>
>
> Flemming videbaek
> videbaek @ bnl.gov
> Brookhaven National Lab
> Physics Department
> Bldg 510D
> Upton, NY 11973
>
> phone: 631-344-4106
> cell: 631-681-1596
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brahms-l mailing list
> Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l

_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l