Hei Ionut, a few comments: 1) your argument about s and sbar does not hold true for RHIC. the lambda/antilambda ratio is close to 1 (at least at y=0) and (K+ + K-) = (K0L + K0S) 2) there is a maximum in K+/pi+ vs pbar/p , i.e. there is no scaling. 3) where is the experimental proof that rescattering (of what?) creates strangeness at SPS or RHIC? What do you mean by evolution time? The time the system spends in the hadronic phase? Why is this time longer at forward y than at mid-rapidity at RHIC? what about Marek's argument concerning the onset of deconfinement? I would suggest you stick to the presentation of our nice data and if you want to speculate you have to say what picture you have in mind, e.g. thermal mode, microscopical model. With best wishes, Dieter Ionut Cristian Arsene wrote: > ... and the document is here > >> Dear Brahms, >> >> Thanks to comments from Flemming, Michael and Trine i made the >> second version of my QM08 abstract. I added 3 references to the >> E802, NA49 and BRAHMS articles containing the data i'm using in >> this work. I also mentioned that in the 62.4 data set, BRAHMS is >> covering a wide range of pbar/p ratio (there is a factor of at >> least 20 between mid-rapidity and y~3). >> The document is attached to this email. There is still time for comments >> until tomorrow afternoon. >> >> Regards, >> Ionut >> >> -- >> Ionut Cristian Arsene >> PhD student at Physics Department, University of Oslo, Norway >> Phone: +47 22856456 (Office) >> Phone: +47 94214593 (Mobile) >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-l mailing list > Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Tue Oct 30 2007 - 11:45:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Oct 30 2007 - 11:45:53 EDT