Minutes of Brahms Analysis meeting, Friday 13th of April 2007 ============================================================= Submitted by Michael Murray Present: JH, Flemming, Ionut, Catlyn, Hongyan Michael, Dipali, Selemon and others. Agenda: http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=14855 Friday 13 April 2007 top 09:30 Status of auau 61 GeV K, pi analysis Ionut Arsene 10:00 DIS 2006 presentation JH Lee 10.40 PP at 62GeV Alte Action Items: Ionut: In MRS make bigger bins. Check STAR or PHENIX paper on mid- rapidity 62GeV. He has done other centrality bins and will present more next week. Catlyn Correct for dead bands in X for T2. Data used DST production version 4 MRS settings: 90(A/B)1050, 90(A/B)350, 45 (A/B)1050, 40A1050 FS settings: 6 degree (A/B)861, 4(A/B)608, 3(A/B)1723 He uses Banapp Method 1 trg3 events for MRS, trg2 events for FS. minimum bias trigger is trig 1(BB) for 0 30% centrality events and trig 4(ZDC) for 30 60% events. I am not using any correction for minimum bias trigger inefficiency. vertex selection: BBC vertex must be within [ 30,+30] cm He is not sure about min bias inefficiency but Flemming thinks its OK. He does fiducial cuts on TPM2 and RICH, TOFW & H2 The track must be within a 5 sigma elliptic region around the vertex for both MRS and FRS have a good Chi^2 and be within acceptance map. Then he corrects for efficiency of tracking, multiple hits and PID (3 sigma) and also for weak decays. He corrects for contamination of kaons and protons when RICH is in veto. For kaons this amounts to 20-30% correction. MRS pion spectra have some mismatch at different settings. For the forward region he worries about the kaons identified by "indirect" PID, ie RICH veto and TOFW => .NOT. protons. Action Item: In MRS make bigger bins. Check STAR or PHENIX paper on mid-rapidity 62GeV. He has done other centrality bins and will present more next week. JH Review of his DIS 2007 talk: =============================== Spin results same as preliminary data shown at last spin meeting but now we have 63GeV cross sections and some Pt depedence. Factorization theorem with short-distance NLO pQCD describe RHIC partonic dynamics Transverse Single Spin Asymmetries(SSA): probing partons' transverse motion and multi-parton correlations inside a hadron At large xF , transversity and multi-parton correlation is more exposed Present energy (62.4, 200 GeV) and Flavor dependent (pi;K) SSAs and cross-sections at large-xF NLO pQCD not working too well at ISR, 200GeV is the first energy where the NLO pQCD works well. The 62GeV cross section are in reasonable aggreement between data and calculations. He may skip showing proton data since this could sidetrack his talk. He compares asymetries to 2 models, (Collins no longer describes low energy data well) whereas Sivers is still in the running but underpredicts our data. Twist 3 seems to be closer but they have some input from data. It is a puzzle that asymetries are similar for kaons and pions. Large xF dependent SSAs seen for pions and kaons, suggesting Sivers mechanism plays an important role. Described (qualitatively) by Twist-3 Main contributions are from leading (favored) quarks, Sivers or Twist 3. Power-suppression of assymetries by ~ 1/pT seems to be seen at 200GeV. www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~videbaek/analysis Flemming. http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~videbaek/analysis/FS_Kaons.png shows that we can get out to Pt = 1.5 GeV for kaons. It might be possible for theorists to produce cross sections down to this Pt. Catlyn. PP at 62GeV =================== Cuts X=±20 cm Y=±15 cm at back of RICH • X= 26, +28cm, Y= 8,+5cm at back of TPM2 • Vertex z range: ±30 cm for all settings • Vertex back projection cut: 3.5 sigma • Accmaps: • Delta pt = 0.025 • Delta y = 0.01 • Error: 5% Uses conservative PID limits at 2 & 3 degrees. Direct pions: 5 10 GeV/c Direct kaons: 10 20 GeV/c Direct protons: 20 30 GeV/c Indirect protons: 10 15 GeV/c (Protons between 15 20 GeV/c currently not identified.) There is a significant contamination of antiprotons that he handles by subtraction of background. For MRS he uses TOFW for PID, since TOFW2 has smaller acceptance and statistics. He has k/pi separation to about 2.2 GeV/c and P/pi separation to about 3 GeV/c Tracks with momenta below 400 MeV/c are not used He corrects for track and RICH inefficies. . For corrections he uses Bramreco GEANT files Tracking efficiency (nkv_2) RICH inefficiency (0.97) PID algorithm efficiency RICH contamination (3 % of pions and kaons). CC correction in FS (0.82), Flemming has not looked at this recently. This factor is OK for the MRS but not for the FS No H2 efficiency, Flemming (should be 98%, correct for dead slats). He has some dead bands in X for T2. Action Item: Correct for these: _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Mon Apr 16 2007 - 13:01:53 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 16 2007 - 13:02:20 EDT