Re: [Brahms-l] Re: qm abstract

From: Pawel Staszel <ufstasze_at_if.uj.edu.pl>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:27:00 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Hongyan,
I think that your abstract is ok. You should
maybe better stress that you want to give a comprehensive picture
of the "extra" d+Au dynamics by comparing d+Au and p+p looking
at rapidity dependence of various observables.

Cheers,
Pawel.

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Yang Hongyan wrote:

> Hi, dear all,
> 
>    the attached file is a new version of my abstract for the qm, please 
> comment on it. Thanks in advance.
> 
> Best regards,
> Hongyan
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
Received on Sat Jul 29 2006 - 10:27:42 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jul 29 2006 - 10:28:04 EDT