Dear Collaborator, I will like to keep you somewhat up to date on the RHIC-II working group progress. There will be presentartions (closed session) at the PAC meeting, followed by the meeting on the 11.-12 November. The chairs of the writting committee is outlining the process in the e-mail below. regards Flemming Subject: Plans and schedule for White Paper preparation > Dear RHIC II White Paper Committee Members and PWG conveners, > > Carl and I would like to outline for everyone our understanding > of the schedule and plans for completing the RHIC II White Paper > and the associated RHIC II PWG reports. This follows discussions > during the past week with Tom Ludlam. > > The White Paper is pictured by Tom to be a 20 page > or so description of the compelling science at RHIC during the > next decade. It will be backed up by written reports from the > physics working groups. The White Paper will likely be a BNL report, > since it is not intended to be a publishable scientific document. > The reports from the working groups, however, are pictured to be > scientific documents that should at least appear on the archive. > They might, if the working groups choose, be submitted for > publication. > > The schedule for the White Paper and the PWG reports > is driven by the date of the DOE Budget Retreat, which is the > end of March next year. > > This is the schedule as we understand it: > > A convener from each RHIC II PWG will make a presentation > at the PAC meeting November 3-5 on the physics goals for > RHIC II. The PAC will be asked to provide feedback on the PWG > reports to BNL management, and to the writing committee and > conveners. We will hopefully get this feedback at the November > 11-12 meeting at BNL. > > The meeting at BNL on November 11-12 will be a joint > meeting of the White Paper writing committee and the PWG > conveners. The agenda for that meeting is on the web at: > > http://www.bnl.gov/physics/rhicIIscience/ > > On Friday, a convener from each working group will summarize > the results of the PWG discussions, and then there will > be a round table discussion about the key science drivers > for RHIC II. Almost all of Saturday will be taken up by > fairly informal White Paper planning - discussions of the > process, the content, the schedule and the writing > assignments. > > The PWG reports should be completed by the end of > the year, so that they will be available as reference material > for the White Paper writing committee. > > Most of you are aware that, in parallel with the White Paper > effort, RHIC is preparing a Mid-term Update that has been requested by > DOE. It is due in Washington by the end of January. The Mid-term Update > will describe the detector upgrades, etc., that are anticipated over the > next ~5 years. It will not include an extensive discussion of the > corresponding scientific justifications, but it will nonetheless represent > important additional input for the writing committee. > > We anticipate that the next face to face meeting of > the writing committee will be in late January of 2006. Phone > meetings that are targeted on specific tasks will be needed > in between. The final document should be ready by the end > of February. This will allow the documents to be in the > hands of the DOE before their budget retreat at the end of > March. > > We look forward to seeing you on November 11. > > Regards > > Carl and Tony > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tony Frawley frawley@fsuhip.physics.fsu.edu > Physics department FSU phone: 850-644-4034 > Florida state University, FSU fax : 850-644-4478 > Tallahassee, FL 32306-4350 > > Cell phone: 850-524-6309 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Wed Nov 2 14:37:51 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 02 2005 - 14:38:05 EST