Re: [Brahms-l] QM abstract

From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje <gardhoje@nbi.dk>
Date: Fri May 20 2005 - 15:37:01 EDT
hello Ionut
Your last sentence sounds like someting out of 'The Lord of the Rings'. I 
think you should explain WHY the K/Pi ratios are interesting, considering 
the p ratios ...... Why rapidty may compensate for beam energy etc...
The PAC is not prone to solving riddles....
cheers
JJ
_________________________________________________________________________
Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Professor, Dr. Sc.
Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16.
UNESCO Natl. Comm.: secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16.
Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk.
_________________________________________________________________________

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ionut Christian Arsene" <i.c.arsene@fys.uio.no>
To: <brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 4:18 PM
Subject: [Brahms-l] QM abstract


>
>   Hi all,
>
>  Thanks for the usefull comments regarding my QM abstract. Here is the
> latest version of the abstract. I already submitted it but if there
> are some last minute comments, feel free to send them. Changes still
> can be made during today.
>
>      Regards,
>        Ionut


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> Brahms-l mailing list
> Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
> 


_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
Received on Fri May 20 15:37:17 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri May 20 2005 - 15:37:29 EDT