Folks- Two useful Landau-type hydro papers are: Carruthers and Duong-van PR D 8, 859, 1973 and Cooper, Frye and Schonberg PR D 11, 192, 1975. The last one not so easy to follow and very analytic; the first more qualitative and intuitive. Chellis -----Original Message----- From: brahms-l-bounces+chasman=sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov@lists.bnl.gov [mailto:brahms-l-bounces+chasman=sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov@lists.bnl.gov]On Behalf Of Peter H.L. Christiansen Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 3:24 AM To: Ionut Christian Arsene Cc: brahms-l Subject: Re: [Brahms-l] 63 AGeV results Hi Ionut and others, I think that it is ofcourse up to the data to see if dN/dy \propto s^(0.25) or s^(0.5) BTW this is the total dN/dy, so that in the Landau picture you would expect dN/dy (y=0) to be bigger since the width of the distribution is smaller at 63AGeV. One nice paper about the Landau model is the one by Peter Steinberger: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/nucl-ex/0405022 Unfortunately I have not found a good paper for an experimentalist like me about these things and most original papers are in russian. To > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Tue Mar 29 10:20:43 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 29 2005 - 10:20:50 EST