Re: [Brahms-l] 63 AGeV results

From: Ian Bearden <bearden@nbi.dk>
Date: Tue Mar 22 2005 - 06:51:00 EST
Thanks for the plot.  Can you plot your cuts on top of the data?
We did this very quickly here last fall and found netp around 40 at 
y~3, so our preliminary
proton yield must be roughly a factor 4 higher than yours.  At y~2, the 
difference looks to be about a factor of
2, while at mid rapidity, the diferences are small.  I don't know how 
trustworthy the 40 is, but I think you will
have problems with baryon number conservation if  netp at y~3 is only 
around 10.
I'll check the status of the local analysis, and see if anything has 
changed.
Cheers,
Ian
On 22/3-2005, at 12:07, Ionut Christian Arsene wrote:

>
>     Hi Ian,
>
>   Thank you for your message. About your question, well looking to 
> Peter's
> nuclear stopping paper, where the net baryon peak is around y=4 with a
> beam rapidity of 5.36 (for 200 GeV), I expect that at 63 GeV this peak
> should be around 3-3.5 roughly because the beam rapidity is ~4.2. So
> that's why I believe that the net-proton yield should be a lot higher
> around y=3.
>   I just posted a plot ahowing the ring radius for RICH at 3B1723 
> setting.
> It's on the same address http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~aic/ , but at the 
> bottom
> of the page.
>
>                        Regards,
>                           Ionut
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Ian Bearden wrote:
>
>> I tried to send this last night, but I guess I did it from another
>> address and it was stopped by the list server.
>> I'll try again!
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Ian Bearden <ianbearden@mac.com>
>>> Date: 21. marts 2005 23:33:49 MET
>>> To: Ionut Christian Arsene <i.c.arsene@fys.uio.no>
>>> Cc: brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
>>> Subject: Re: [Brahms-l] 63 AGeV results
>>>
>>> Hi Ionut,
>>> I have one question about your analysis.  You say you use the RICH to
>>> ID protons at y=3,
>>> do you have a plot of the RICH mass (or ring radius) showing what you
>>> ID as pi,K, p?
>>> You say that the net-p point is significantly lower than expected.
>>> What is the basis of your expectation?
>>>
>>> I'm sure I'll have more questions/comments as I read and look more
>>> carefully,
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>> On 18/3-2005, at 12:46, Ionut Christian Arsene wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>      Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>    I obtained some results from the Au+Au 63 AGeV data run. A part 
>>>> of
>>>> the
>>>> graphs are posted at the following address:
>>>>   http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~aic/.
>>>> In the next days I will update the page with new plots.
>>>>    I would like to present these results at the workshop that will
>>>> take
>>>> place in Bergen at the end of this month, so I will appreciate your
>>>> comments and sugestions about these results.
>>>>
>>>>              Regards,
>>>>                 Ionut
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Brahms-l mailing list
>>>> Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
>>>> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
Received on Tue Mar 22 06:51:20 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 22 2005 - 06:51:27 EST