Hi Eun-Joo, Just one comment to your draft. You say (bottom of page 5) that "the pt coverage of spectra at y~1 is not sufficient for a reliable hydro model fit" and for this reason we cannot (unfortunately) extract the flow velocity at this rapidity (y~1). Next page, you give in Table III the values of dN/dy at both y=0 and y~1. This is obtained by fitting an exponential (or sum of 2 exponential functions for p and pbar) to the mt spectra in order to extrapolate outside of the measured region. Here you don't say anything about the reliability of the fit at y~1! This point needs to be discussed in the paper. We should perhaps give some systematic errors on the values of dN/dy (Table III). Best regards, Fouad ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Fouad RAMI e-mail: fouad.rami@ires.in2p3.fr IReS phone : 33.(0)3.88.10.62.00 23,rue du Loess : 33.(0)3.88.10.64.55 B.P.28-BAT.20 (secretary's office) 67037 Strasbourg Cedex 2 fax : 33.(0)3.88.10.66.14 France ----------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Eun-Joo Kim wrote: > With new lambda correction function, Fig 4, bottom, > I made new figures for paper. (Fig4-Fig12) > The resulting numbers, such as dNdy, <pt>, net p, BW fit and so on, > from p, pbar spectra are slightly changed. > However, conclusion or most text parts are remained same. > When two committee members come back from Colorado, India, > I would like to submit paper next week. > > http://kunuc6.phsx.ku.edu/~ejkim/centrality.pdf > > Thanks... > > Eun-Joo > > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-l mailing list > Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Fri Feb 11 11:00:31 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 11 2005 - 11:00:39 EST