---------------------------------------------------------------- Flemming Videbaek Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory FYI I have attached the notes + a table from Phil Pile outlining the present run plan allowing for 25 RHIC cryo weeks. Note also the summary of the coordination meeting as of yesterday Flemming *** From Phil Pile, CA-D > Follow-up to the below notes... > > RHIC cryo work begins with a full nitrogen cool down of the RHIC magnets on > 14 Oct. Any schedule changes should be decided before that date (our target > date is then the wednesday meeting before this --- 13 Oct) - by request, I > have attached the week-by-week schedule I presented at the meeting.. > best regards, > Phil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pile, Philip H > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:48 PM > To: Lo Presti, Penny; Aronson, Samuel; Bai, Mei; Baker, Mark; Beavis, Dana; > Bond, Peter D; Brennan, Joseph; Bunce, Gerry M; 'busza@mit.edu'; Butler, > Michael A; Christie, William; Drees, K. Angelika; Fischer, Wolfram; Gibbard, > Bruce; Gordon, Howard A; 'Gulshan.Rai@science.doe.gov'; > 'gunther.roland@cern.ch'; Guryn, Wlodzimierz; Hallman, Timothy J; Heimerle, > Marion V; 'hofman@uic.edu'; Huang, Haixin; > 'Jehanne.Simon-Gillo@science.doe.gov'; 'jhthomas@lbl.gov'; Kirk, Thomas B; > 'lajoie@iastate.edu'; Lee, Jeong-Hun; Ljubicic, Ante; Lowenstein, Derek I; > Ludlam, Thomas W; Mackay, William W; Makdisi, Yousef I; 'matthias@bnl.gov'; > Montag, Christoph; O'Brien, Edward; Ozaki, Satoshi; Pak, Robert; Peggs, > Stephen G; 'peter.steinberg@bnl.gov'; Petway, Annabelle; Pilat, Fulvia C; > Roser, Thomas; 'saito@nh.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp'; Samios, Nicholas P; > Satogata, Todd J; Throwe, Thomas; Trbojevic, Dejan; Videbaek, Flemming; > 'vigdor@iucf.indiana.edu'; Yamin, Peter; Yip, Kin; 'younggr@ornl.gov'; Zajc, > William; Zukowski, Elaine D > Subject: RHIC Machine & Experiments Meeting Wednesday, September 22, 2004 > > > A short note on some of the discussion in today's meeting: > > (1) All systems are still on track for a 8 Nov cool-down start. > > (2) On the issue of the appropriate time lag between the end of a given RHIC > run and the RHIC Program Committee meeting charged with giving advice on > beams for the next run...The consensus was the program committee meeting > should not be held sooner than about 2 months after the close-out meeting > for the previous run. The close-out meeting generally occurs about a month > after the end of a run, so for example, if RUN5 ends on 30 April then the > program committee meeting to decide the type and order of ions for the next > run should optimally be scheduled in August. This gives the experiments > enough time to formally decide on their respective beam requests. > > (3) There was a brief discussion of when data analysis of RUN4 would come to > an end. The experiments agreed that the bulk of the analysis should be > completed by the time of the next Quark Matter conference (next Summer) with > some targeted analysis completed much sooner. > > (4) There was discussion about a further delay to the start of RUN5. The > logic is a further delay may allow enough time for Congress to enact the > FY2005 budget so that planning for RUN5 can properly take into account > available funds. It was recognized that a decision on this should be made > about 2 weeks prior to the 8 Nov cool-down date in order to minimize > disruption of work activities. This will continue to be a topic of > discussion at the next few Wednesday Meetings. > > best regards, > Phil > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 11:20:40 EDT