Dear Brahms collaborators, Enclosed please find a (first) draft for the BRAHMS 'white paper' on GQP at RHIC - to be discussed on tuesday at the collaboration meeting. Please note that the small editorial comittee that we had appointed has not yet had a chance to comment, so you can with good conscience limit yourselves to blaming ME for all that you undoubtedly will find is wrong, missing misleading and incomplete! This is indeed a first draft. Much remains to be done in terms of improving the text, sharpening the arguments, deciding on a conclusion, including proper references and selecting the most representative set of figures. On Tuesday we have set aside a fair amount of time to discuss this document. I do not plan to go through a lengthy presentation of the document. Rather I think that we should discuss the overall philosophy and then proceed to discussiong the main points and figures in each subsection and at the end see if we can formulate a conclusion. This requires however that you have read the document carefully before tuesday morning in Oslo. I will be happy to receive comments right away, although not much more will happen until tuesday. In particular, I would like to request input for missing figures from the following people (I don't have suitable .EPS versions here): Michael: Figure(s) showing chemical model fits to BRAHMS data vs rapidity. JH and EJK: Figure illustrating blastwave analysis Ramiro: the figures that went into the CGC paper Steve: the figures that went into the lates d?Au mult. paper. Dieter: suitable figures to illustrate the identified high pt- suppression. Djamel: the figures that went into the meson paper. Peter: the latest figures that went into the stopping paper. regards JJ _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 08 2004 - 13:54:37 EDT