Ciao Peter, > I would just make the comment that Nch ~ 4600+-400 (-4.7 < eta < 4.7) + I know, this is why I said "a bit more if -inf < eta < +inf" > 200? outside and Phobos says 5000+-200 for total, but we also supposedly > have some 2-300 net-p+netK outside our acceptance... > > It would be nice to put the Phobos data on the same plot if available. I'll try. > I think you have done a great job and it is nice to see that the data > used to form different dN/dy points at forward rapidity in the dN/dy > plot when related in the dN/deta (Figure 2 and Figure 15) seems to agree > well. yes, I was pleased to see that :) > For figure 11 the agreement is less nice, but it loks ok, and > anyway it is a tricky thing as you say and I guess that there is also > not a one to one correspondance between your y-pT and eta-pT histogram. As I mentioned to you previously, yes, the mapping is tricky and I introduced a small error by choosing the same binning, but I guess root has not yet implemented the conform transform of a binning in 2D :) Djam _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Tue May 4 11:05:23 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 04 2004 - 11:05:41 EDT