One final iteration of my Bormio proceeding - thanks a lot to all who have commented. (Esp. to J.H. for catching the STAR central/non-central howler - a copy-and-paste bummer ;-) I have included most of the comments - a few replies: * J.H./Yung: You're both right - shadowing is important and must be mentioned, but I don't show the data and don't have space to do so... Compromise: I've combined conclusion points 3 and 4 into one discussion. * Peter: You're right about the CGC formula and the need for further discussion, but I really don't want to spend a whole page discussing the rather speculative CGC <Bjorn ducks for cover ;-> in what is intended to be a more general paper... I've referenced the formula to hep-ph/0303204, which discusses all of this stuff in great detail. If anyone wants a final read-through the current draft is in the usual place: http://www.fys.uio.no/~bjornhs/brahms/bormio04/ I will submit it tomorrow, Sunday. (Yes, I know it's the weekend, but I think most comments are in and answered and I'm well over my deadline ;-) Ping :-) -- Bjorn H. Samset Phone: 22856465/92051998 PhD student, heavy ion physics Adr: Schouterrassen 6 Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo 0573 Oslo \|/ ----------------------------> -*- <----------------------------- /|\ _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Sat Mar 20 07:35:34 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 20 2004 - 07:35:51 EST