RE: [Brahms-l] meson paper

From: Chellis Chasman <chasman@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov>
Date: Mon Mar 15 2004 - 10:18:49 EST
Since the initial state is not isospin symmetric
is Djamel's comment below exact?
                       Chellis




-----Original Message-----
From: brahms-l-bounces@lists.bnl.gov
[mailto:brahms-l-bounces@lists.bnl.gov]On Behalf Of Djamel Ouerdane
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:09 AM
To: Dieter Rohrich
Cc: Brahms List
Subject: Re: [Brahms-l] meson paper

Djamel wrote.......

I think the real issue is K0. Isospin conservation tells us that
we have N(K+) = N(K0) and N(K-) = N(K0bar).








--

Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o
|  Niels Bohr Institute      |  Home:                     |
|  Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø |  Jagtvej 141 2D,           |
|  Fax: +45 35 32 50 16      |  DK-2200 Copenhagen N      |
|  Tel: +45 35 32 52 69      |  +45 35 86 19 74           |
|                  http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane            |
|                  ouerdane@nbi.dk                        |
o---------------------------------------------------------o



_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l


_______________________________________________
Brahms-l mailing list
Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-l
Received on Mon Mar 15 10:16:43 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 15 2004 - 10:17:05 EST