Hi JJ, Thanks for the feedback. I'm open to a Phys. Lett. B submission: As a told Ian earlier, my only concern is that from our experience with the 130 mult paper, its not clear anyone from our community (at least our competitors...) read the journal! I have not seen anything on the Phobos paper. Hiro went to the presentation at the DNP and there they only showed min-bias results (Hiro, correct me if I am wrong on this). The paper had not shown up on their web site as of last evening. I've stated this publicly and privately in the past: Either we push this paper through in the next few weeks, or it is going to lose much of its interest. Regards, Steve On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 02:42 PM, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje wrote: > Dear Steve > I have read the draft for the d+Au. I think it is a nice piece of work > which is practically finished. > I would suggest to proceed with submission as soon as possible and to > announce right away our intention to submit in a week. > Where to send it? > I would suggest Physics Letters B. > Perhaps it could even bear a PRL if the discussion section regarding > the comparison to saturation models is beefed up a bit -although I > have not had the time to study the PHOBOS paper (is there much > overlap?). > regards > JJ > > ____________________________________________________________ > Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc. > Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. > Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 > 16. > UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16. > Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk. > ____________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-l mailing list Brahms-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-lReceived on Wed Nov 12 09:14:11 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 09:14:32 EST