From: Borge Svane Nielsen (borge@alf.nbi.dk)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2003 - 03:06:32 EDT
Hi, I agree with Steve. We don't want to leave out d+AU from the title. I vote for option 2, although I would put Au+Au before d+Au. Børge +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Børge Svane Nielsen E-mail: borge@nbi.dk | | Technical Coordinator http://www.nbi.dk/~borge | | Niels Bohr Institute Phone: (+45) 3532 5433 | | University of Copenhagen Fax: (+45) 3532 5465 | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Ian Bearden wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > As submission time draws nigh, no one seems to be satisfied with the > working title of the paper. > Here are a couple of alternatives for your consideration: > Pseudorapidity depedence of high pT suppression in Au+Au at > sqrt(snn)=200GeV > That is, we drop d+Au in the title since that gives us the biggest > problem. > Another alternative: > Transverse momentum spectra in d+Au and Au+Au collisions at > sqrt(snn)=200GeV and the rapidity dependence of high pT suppression. > What do y'all think? > -Ian >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 02 2003 - 11:36:35 EDT