Fwd: a simple simulation study for the effect of pion decay on RICH ring

From: Ramiro Debbe (debbe@bnl.gov)
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:26:14 EST

  • Next message: Apache: "Shift report 20030313 16:00-24:00"
    Begin forwarded message:
    
    > From: Ramiro Debbe <debbe@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov>
    > Date: Wed Mar 12, 2003  5:16:55 PM US/Eastern
    > To: brahms-l@bnl.gov
    > Subject: Re: a simple simulation study for the effect of pion decay on 
    > RICH ring
    >
    > I would emphasize Peter suggestion that muon ring centers may be off 
    > (if the decay happened after T5). As I remember the RICH algorithm 
    > uses the track to set the ring center and then it calculates an 
    > average ring radius, I would suggest to use that step as pattern 
    > recognition and then fit the selected pixels with radius and center as 
    > variables. If the two centers are different we may be able to set a 
    > cut to eliminate the decays or to extract a correction from the data.
    >
    > Ramiro
    > On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, at 04:59 PM, Djamel Ouerdane wrote:
    >
    >> Hi Zhongbao,
    >>
    >> I agree with Peter except that you should get inspired by Claus' 
    >> complete
    >> rewriting of the C1 digitization (I think he finished the stuff for 
    >> C1,
    >> for the RICH, it should not be that different, you can pick up some
    >> geometry stuff from the pid module). It would be great to have a full
    >> digitization of the RICH to study its response with simulated tracks.
    >>
    >> Djam
    >>
    >>
    >> Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o
    >> |  Niels Bohr Institute      |  Home:                     |
    >> |  Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø |  Jagtvej 141 2D,           |
    >> |  Fax: +45 35 32 50 16      |  DK-2200 Copenhagen N      |
    >> |  Tel: +45 35 32 52 69      |  +45 35 86 19 74           |
    >> |                  http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane            |
    >> |                  ouerdane@nbi.dk                        |
    >> o---------------------------------------------------------o
    >>
    >
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 12 2003 - 17:26:51 EST