Re: qm proc again

From: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Fri Nov 22 2002 - 07:00:31 EST

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "[Fwd: associate professor position in Nantes]"
    Hi Djam
    I think that you should keep the figures. This is after all just a
    conference contribution and not a paper. I think the readers are more
    interested in the preliminary data, than in many words. In any case the QM
    proceedings will not see the light of day until after the summer of 2003 (at
    best). Hopefully we have submitted a letter with the results before then.
    That is theplace to fine tune the arguments. Here we should be conservative
    on interpretation.
    regards
    jj
    ____________________________________________________________
    Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Assoc. Prof., Dr. Sc.
    Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09, secr. (+45) 35 32 52 09, Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16.
    UNESCO Natl. Comm., secr. (+45) 33 92 52 16.
    Email: gardhoje@nbi.dk.
    ____________________________________________________________
    
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Djamel Ouerdane" <ouerdane@nbi.dk>
    To: "Dieter Rohrich" <dieter@fi.uib.no>
    Cc: "Brahms List" <brahms-l@bnl.gov>
    Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:31 AM
    Subject: Re: qm proc again
    
    
    > Hi Dieter and others,
    >
    > Thanks for the comments.
    >
    > I cannot tell more about the K/pi ratio. This is what we got so far after
    > checks and rechecks and it is preliminary. We anyway are consistent with
    > STAR considering the systematic errors and STAR could also be off (why
    us?)
    > But we are refining the analysis.
    >
    > Concerning the (according to me) important point you make about the
    > physics issues, I always had in mind that it was somehow missing but it is
    > due to a lack of space. I was thinking about dropping Fig 1 and give more
    > space for a short discussion at the end.
    >
    > What does the collab think about that ? fig.1 is cool but is it more
    > important than this missing discussion ?
    >
    > Djam
    >
    > --
    > Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o
    > |  Niels Bohr Institute      |  Home:                     |
    > |  Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø |  Jagtvej 141 2D,           |
    > |  Fax: +45 35 32 50 16      |  DK-2200 Copenhagen N      |
    > |  Tel: +45 35 32 52 69      |  +45 35 86 19 74           |
    > |                  http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane            |
    > |                  ouerdane@nbi.dk                        |
    > o---------------------------------------------------------o
    >
    >
    >
    >
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 22 2002 - 07:11:05 EST