Hi, did you know that figure 3 and figure 4 from our latest paper on our web pages are the same? Figure 3 should have been ratio as a function of y, but instead it is K-/K+ plotted against anti-p/p, which is the same as figure 4. It should be fixed by someone who has the figure. (the paper is not in the CVS respository either...) http://www.sdcc.bnl.gov/brahms/publication_data/ratio_2002/ Regards, Truls -- *------------------------------* |http://folk.uio.no/truml / |Truls Martin Larsen / |T.M.Larsen@fys.uio.no . |University of Oslo // |Department of Physics / \0 |P.O.Box 1048 Blindern /\_/ |0316 Oslo, Norway / / |Tel: +47 22854331 / -- | /_/ | |Home address: / \ |Eiksvn 58 | ' |1361 Østerås | |Tel: +47 67155618 | |Mob: +47 99691838 | *------------------*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Sep 03 2002 - 06:11:06 EDT