I forgot to mention one thing: The eff for mrs is only with matching, not the TOFW. Efficiency for TPM1 and TPM2 are high ~95-97 range for 90 deg setting. It really seems that the matching imposes most of the eff loss. See you at QM, Truls Truls Martin Larsen wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have finally managed to make some efficiency plots. They are here: > > http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~trulsml/ > > The statistics are not very good (~8000), but will be better after QM. > I did not have time for long analysis', since things started working > mid last week, and of course a nfs connection box broke, and stopped > my computer (and others..) on friday. Only to be fixed this morning. > > Murphy's law seems to be well and alive.... > > Regards, > Truls > > PS my poster for the QM is also there. But only in a A3 format. > -- *------------------------------* |http://folk.uio.no/truml / |Truls Martin Larsen / |T.M.Larsen@fys.uio.no . |University of Oslo // |Department of Physics / \0 |P.O.Box 1048 Blindern /\_/ |0316 Oslo, Norway / / |Tel: +47 22854331 / -- | /_/ | |Home address: / \ |Eiksvn 58 | ' |1361 Østerås | |Tel: +47 67155618 | |Mob: +47 99691838 | *------------------*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 15 2002 - 07:18:29 EDT