RE: ratios paper

From: Chellis Chasman (chasman@sgs1.hirg.bnl.gov)
Date: Mon Jul 01 2002 - 12:48:24 EDT

Next message: Joe Natowitz: "Ratios2.04"

Previous message: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "Re: Abstract for Mini-symposium on High pt Physics at DNP02"
In reply to: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "ratios paper"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Folks-
Two comments on the paper:

1) I support Steve's suggestions both English usage and physics.
In particular, I think the suggestion to put AMPT curves on figure 3
would be a very good contribution to the physics and requires no
additional space.

2)We say in two places that the constancy of the particle ratios supports
Bjorken's boost invariance.  One place, notably,  is the final sentence of
the
paper.  I don't think this is a solid conclusion from our data, or that it
is the most important result.  I suggest that we, at least, remove it from
the conclusions and possibly from the text as well.

                                                     Chellis
===========================
Chellis Chasman
Physics Department, Bldg 510D
Brookhaven National Lab
Upton, NY 11973
Tel: 631-344-3990
Fax: 631-344-1334
E-mail: chasman@bnl.gov

Next message: Joe Natowitz: "Ratios2.04"
Previous message: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "Re: Abstract for Mini-symposium on High pt Physics at DNP02"
In reply to: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "ratios paper"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 01 2002 - 13:07:17 EDT